What Do Independent Medical Experts Do to Support your Case | Nash & Co Solicitors
Written by Mike Shiers and Rebecca Brisley | Medical Negligence team | 25 February 2026
If your kidney cancer diagnosis was delayed or mismanaged, independent medical experts play a crucial role in supporting your negligence claim. Their professional analysis is often the most persuasive evidence when proving that healthcare professionals failed to meet the standard of care and that delays affected treatment or prognosis.
Understanding what experts do, how they review evidence, and how their reports are used in claims helps you feel more informed and confident. This guide explains the process in detail and shows why involving experts is essential.
Why independent medical experts are essential in kidney cancer claims
In a kidney cancer negligence claim, two main questions must be answered:
Breach of duty: did a healthcare professional fail to provide care at the standard expected?
Causation: did that failure cause a delay in diagnosis or treatment that impacted outcomes?
Independent medical experts provide impartial opinions on both points. Their analysis is widely respected by insurers, courts, and solicitors because it is objective, professional, and evidence based. Without such expert input, it can be extremely difficult to demonstrate that negligence occurred.
Experts can identify mistakes that may not be obvious in the medical records alone. For example, a specialist may highlight that early symptoms of kidney cancer were missed or misinterpreted, which directly contributed to delayed diagnosis.
What experts review in kidney cancer claims
Independent medical experts carefully examine every aspect of your care. Key areas of review include:
Medical records and documentation: experts review GP notes, hospital letters, referrals, and consultation records. They assess whether symptoms were properly noted, whether appropriate investigations were requested, and whether referrals were made promptly
Tests and imaging: CT scans, MRIs, ultrasounds, and blood tests are carefully analysed. Experts check whether the tests were conducted on time, interpreted correctly, and whether abnormal results were acted upon. They may also identify whether additional tests should have been requested earlier
Referral and follow-up procedures: experts examine the speed and appropriateness of referrals between GPs, hospitals, and specialists. Delays in arranging consultations, missed follow-ups, or failure to act on urgent test results can all be highlighted in an expert report
Comparison against clinical standards: experts compare the care you received against accepted clinical guidelines and professional standards. They assess whether actions taken were reasonable and whether any delay in diagnosis was avoidable
Impact on treatment and outcomes
A crucial part of the report is assessing whether earlier diagnosis would have changed treatment options, surgery options, or prognosis. This causation analysis is what determines whether negligence contributed to harm.
How experts prepare their reports
Independent medical experts follow a structured process:
Review all evidence: every medical record, scan, and correspondence is analysed to understand the patient’s care pathway.
Assess the standard of care: experts determine whether actions taken were reasonable for the symptoms presented.
Evaluate causation: they judge whether earlier recognition of symptoms would likely have affected treatment or outcomes.
Prepare a formal report: the findings are written in a professional, structured report, often including a summary of errors, timelines, and expert opinion.
This report is then provided to your solicitor and forms a cornerstone of the claim. It is objective, detailed, and written so that non-medical professionals can understand it.
Common misconceptions about expert reports
“The expert will guarantee compensation”: expert reports are persuasive but are just one part of the evidence in a claim. The expert owes a duty to the Court to provide an independent unbiased opinion
“I need to hire the expert myself”: the solicitor organises independent assessments; clients do not contact experts directly.
“Only one expert is enough”: some cases may require multiple reports, particularly if care involved several professionals or hospitals.
Practical examples of expert involvement
Consider a patient whose blood in urine and back pain were repeatedly dismissed:
The expert reviews all GP consultations to determine if symptoms were recorded and acted upon
They examine hospital scans and lab results to see if abnormal results were ignored
They compare the patient’s care to national guidelines for kidney cancer diagnosis
They conclude whether earlier intervention would likely have changed treatment options or prognosis
This detailed assessment provides the legal team with a clear, evidence-based argument when negotiating with your opponents or in court. By preparing evidence correctly, Nash & Co Solicitors ensure the expert report is comprehensive, accurate, and fully supports your claim.
How Nash & Co Solicitors guide the process
At Nash & Co Solicitors, we organise expert assessments and liaise with specialists, explain each report’s purpose and what it covers, and advise on additional evidence that can strengthen the claim.
Clients speak directly with an experienced member of the Medical Negligence team who provides guidance clearly, without pressure. This approach helps clients understand the role of experts and the contribution their report makes to the overall claim.
We assist clients across Plymouth, Devon, Cornwall, and throughout the UK, handling kidney cancer misdiagnosis claims with professionalism and attention to detail. You can contact us on 01752 827067 or email medneg@nash.co.uk.
-
They provide impartial opinions on whether care fell below standard and whether delays affected outcomes and the prognosis.
-
No. Nash & Co Solicitors arrange the specialist assessments to ensure independence and credibility.
-
It depends on specialist availability and the complexity of your care, typically several months.
-
No. It forms a key part of your evidence but is considered alongside medical records, timelines, and correspondence. Remember, that the expert is there to provide an open and honest, unbiased opinion.
-
Some cases require multiple specialists, especially if several professionals or departments were involved.
-
Occasionally. Experts may request to see you to clarify symptoms or care history, arranged professionally.
-
Yes. Our Medical Negligence team supports clients across Devon, Cornwall, and the UK.
